|   | 
    
      
        Studio Associato Bernardo Secchi Paola Viganò 
          Architecture | Urbanism | Landscape  | 
       
      
        |  Grand Paris 2_Habiter | 
       
     
        
      
        
        
          | client: | 
          France Goverment, Conseil scientifique de l'AIGP  | 
         
        
          | program: | 
          territorial vision | 
         
        
          | date: | 
          2012-2013 | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          | consultant: | 
          PTV France, Tribu Energie, Biodiversité, MOXOX | 
         
        
          | team: | 
           studio  
            
             M.Durand, N. Fonty, A. Rafful, R.Sega, G.Vanneste, P.Varloteaux, M.Wauters, Q.Zhang 
             | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          | link: | 
          LE T1 DU GRAND PARIS entre Saint-Denis & La Courneuve | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          |   | 
            | 
         
        
          The vision and strategy we propose is based  on the idea that all ongoing major transformations  give the occasion to redefine the livability of Greater Paris, and it is from  this that it might be also possible to enhance the territory of the metropolis. 
              Living  is a complex practice that is about people and 'city -users ' economic actors  pursuing their activities and those arriving to implement others, it is a  practice regarding proposed new residents in urban projects and  all those who have cultural relations today or memory with the territory. For  these practices live must comply places in living spaces, as temporary stable ,  reduce the current risks, resolve conflicts between the territory of production,  territories mobility and habitat rediscover  the slopes and channels, large parks on the edge of Grand Paris and the River  Seine, and finally restore the ecological relationships at different scales. 
          This  is from an open but sufficiently clear in its definitions vision, goals and  assumptions , which may raise the question of the meaning and coherence of  urban and landscape changes in current and future.  | 
         
        
       
       |